Gender Bias, Misogyny and Backlash: What Did the Six Stages Framework See?

SSF Weekly Reflection cover for “Gender Bias, Misogyny and Backlash: What Did the Six Stages Framework See?” showing people at the centre of red and green arrows representing different directions of movement. The image reflects the Six Stages Framework as a dynamic and fluid model and explores progress, backlash and what influences direction of travel.

In 2022, the Six Stages Framework was already exploring gender bias as a dynamic and fluid process involving silence, dismissal, blame, entrenchment and extreme advocacy. Four years later, Dr Shungu M’gadzah revisits that work to ask what stood up, what became more complex and what the SSF has learned.

What Dolly Parton Taught Us About Belonging Across Difference

SSF Weekly Reflection #011 graphic exploring Dolly Parton, music, identity, empathy and belonging across difference through the Six Stages Framework.

Why did Dolly Parton seem to connect with people across race, class, faith, sexuality and politics? This SSF Weekly Reflection explores childhood memory, music, poverty, Whitney Houston, allyship and what it means to create belonging without requiring sameness.

Accountability and Certainty: When the Evidence Is Never Enough

Person standing between shorter and longer roads to certainty, illustrating unequal evidence thresholds, accountability and organisational responsibility.

How much certainty do we require before taking action — and is that threshold the same for every issue? This week’s SSF reflection explores the accountability spotlight, unequal roads to certainty and whether accountability should begin before certainty ends.

What Are Our Environments Creating?

Dr Shungu Hilda M’gadzah beside a translucent digital mask and fragmented human figures, illustrating perfection, declining connection and the question of what our environments are creating.

What are our environments creating? This SSF Weekly Reflection explores how narrow ideals of perfection may shape our responses to difference, vulnerability and the early warning signs appearing in our relationships and communities.

Preparing for Extremes: Why We Wait Until Crisis Arrives

Through the SSF Lens Weekly Reflection #008 graphic titled “The Cost of Not Preparing for Extremes,” showing a lighthouse beside stormy seas and asking why systems wait for crisis before responding to warning signs.

Extreme events may feel sudden, but the conditions that make them possible often develop long before crisis arrives. This SSF Weekly Reflection explores why warning signs become normalised, why reassurance is mistaken for readiness, and why early intervention is an act of care.

Human Encounters: How Do People Feel After They Encounter Us?

Through the SSF Lens Weekly Reflection graphic titled “Human Encounters: How do people feel after they encounter us?”

Every human encounter leaves a psychological trace. This SSF Weekly Reflection explores what happens between people, how our emotional state and bias shape interactions, and why the question may not simply be what we intended, but what became possible for the other person after encountering us.

What Lens Are You Looking Through: Psychological Lenses?

Featured image for Through the SSF Lens Weekly Reflection #006 showing a symbolic camera lens revealing two different interpretations of the same scene, illustrating how a psychological lens shapes perception, curiosity and understanding.

Why do two people see exactly the same situation yet reach completely different conclusions? This reflection explores how our psychological lenses shape what we notice, what we overlook and how curiosity begins with examining the lens through which we see the world.

Why Harm Rarely Begins with Extremism: The Six Stages Framework and the Psychology of Escalation

Through the SSF Lens cover for SSF Weekly Reflection #5, showing a person standing at a crossroads between two contrasting pathways. One path leads towards belonging, connection and hope, while the other leads towards division, dehumanisation and harm. The image symbolises the Six Stages Framework as a continuum of psychological movement and choice.

What if harm rarely begins with extremism? This week’s SSF Weekly Reflection explores how the Six Stages Framework helps us understand the psychology of escalation. Rather than focusing only on visible acts of hate or extremism, it examines the gradual psychological movement from curiosity and dialogue towards certainty, division and harm, highlighting why recognising these movements early creates opportunities for prevention, belonging and systems change.

Login Here

List of Services

  • Executive Leadership coaching from £250/ hour
  • EDI Supervision and support £130/hour
  • Diversity Equity and Inclusion Coaching £150/hour
  • Bespoke Diversity & Inclusion Training from £2000/day
  • Race and mental health coaching £120
  • Anti racism expert affidavits starts from £800
  • Individual diversity assessments- inclusion profiles (prices vary)
  • Organisational diversity assessments (prices vary)
  • Psychological assessment for anti racism claims starts from £1,400

Get in Touch

If you would like to know more about what we can offer then please get in touch and let us know what you are looking for.

Contact

Sign Up for our Newsletter
Updates, News, Resources & Discounts